Analyse a case of The Prosecutor v. Abdel Raheem Muhammad Hussein Essay

Analyse a case of The prosecuting attorney v. Abdel Raheem Muhammad ibn Talal Hussein - Essay ExampleAlso attributed against him be the war crimes of murder, attacks against a civilian population, destruction of property, rape, pillaging, and unhallow upon personal dignity, all punishable under the same statute. The warrant was issued based on the belief that Hussein was a key person in the counter-insurgency visualise that involved attacks against civilians to end the conflict in Darfur between the armed groups SLM/A or the Sudanese Liberation Movement/Army and JEM or Justice and equating Movement (JEM) against the government of Sudan and the militia Janjaweed. These unlawful attacks were executed by the Sudanese armed forces and/or the militia/Janjaweed to target the people belonging to Fur, Masalit and Zaghawa ethnic groups who were known as rebel supporters (International Criminal Court, 2014).The issue on the war in Darfur is an ongoing problem that many have called genoci de. Thousands have died before the rest of the dry land became aware of what was happening in that region of Sudan. The International Justice Project (IJP) writes that it was in March of 2005 when the coupled Nations Security Council released a resolution that referred the matter to the ICC. It was also after this time when the people behind the attacks were brought to the anxiety of the Chambers of the court. Hussein, accused as one of the primary perpetrators in thinking up of the common plan which gave financial and military support to a non-government group through Janjaweed other than the government forces who are to widen out the violent plans against rebel forces even if the same would cause many civilian casualties (International Justice Project, 2012). The Janjaweed, who are primarily Arabs, carried out the execution of their counterparts especially of non-Arab backgrounds. The group has been accused of ethnic cleansing by consciously killing the